Skip to content

Conversation

@priyanshu-ctds
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #xyz

Main Issue: #xyz

PIP: #xyz

Motivation

Modifications

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

  • Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
    Bookkeeper version upgraded from 4.17.1.0.0.4 to 4.17.1.0.0.5 in pom and licences.
  • The public API
  • The schema
  • The default values of configurations
  • The threading model
  • The binary protocol
  • The REST endpoints
  • The admin CLI options
  • The metrics
  • Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

  • doc
  • doc-required
  • doc-not-needed
  • doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:

@priyanshu-ctds priyanshu-ctds self-assigned this Dec 5, 2025
@priyanshu-ctds priyanshu-ctds changed the title [improve][misc]Upgrade bookkeeper to 4.17.1.0.0.5 [improve][misc] Upgrade bookkeeper to 4.17.1.0.0.5 Dec 5, 2025
@ganesh-ctds ganesh-ctds force-pushed the 4.0_ds_bookkeeper_upgrade branch from 662c37e to b7238a7 Compare December 8, 2025 17:45
@ganesh-ctds ganesh-ctds force-pushed the 4.0_ds_bookkeeper_upgrade branch from b7238a7 to e36ee95 Compare December 9, 2025 05:30
@ganesh-ctds ganesh-ctds closed this Dec 9, 2025
@ganesh-ctds ganesh-ctds reopened this Dec 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants