Make FutureResult non-Send when no-std

[Fedeparma74]

Description

This PR updates the FutureResult type alias in the async persister implementation to support non-Send futures when the std feature is disabled.

Previously, the FutureResult type always required the Send bound, which prevented no_std environments from using non-Send futures. With this change, the bound is applied only when the std feature is enabled.

This improves compatibility for embedded or no_std targets while keeping full Send safety for standard environments.

Notes to the reviewers

The change is minimal and fully backwards compatible.
It only affects compilation under no_std builds and does not modify any runtime behavior or APIs under the std feature.

Please confirm that this approach aligns with the intended async API design and does not conflict with downstream usage expectations.

Changelog notice

Changed

• Relaxed the FutureResult type alias to allow non-Send futures in no_std builds.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 18875521602

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 84.995%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 18850737341:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	7001
Relevant Lines:	8237

---

💛 - Coveralls

[ValuedMammal]

Concept ACK

[luisschwab]

@Fedeparma74 you should rebase your branch on top of master instead of merging. There's no need to have a merge commit on the master branch.

[Fedeparma74]

@Fedeparma74 you should rebase your branch on top of master instead of merging. There's no need to have a merge commit on the master branch.

Wooops, sorry! I forgot about this PR and quickly updated my fork as I needed it for another project. Rebased now :)

[luisschwab]

Concept ACK. Verified that CI passes on my fork and looks ok. @ValuedMammal can you trigger CI?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.24%. Comparing base (d825f8c) to head (acc0c5f).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #335   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.24%   85.24%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        8229     8229           
=======================================
  Hits         7015     7015           
  Misses       1214     1214           

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust	85.24% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ValuedMammal]

ACK acc0c5f

I'm not aware of anyone downstream who would be negatively affected. As you said, the change is non-breaking and backwards compatible.

[luisschwab]

ACK acc0c5f