-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Feature/sungbino caf calo updates 2025 a #559
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
kjplows
merged 15 commits into
SBNSoftware:release/SBN2025A
from
sungbinoh:feature/sungbino_caf-calo-updates_2025A
Sep 5, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ba72c99
Cleanup code for getting IDEs associated with SimChannels
gputnam 90cdf65
Draft of code to get costh_drift (cos_phi, e.g.) and the efield into …
gputnam 98b624d
Incorporate updates to CAF calo-truth matching into calibration ntupl…
gputnam aa5484c
Lookup TrackHitMeta object correctly.
gputnam 5b70b40
Merge branch 'feature/gputnam-caf-calo-updates' into feature/sungbino…
sungbinoh 455cb8d
adding phi
sungbinoh b15f1f8
Merge branch 'release/SBN2025A' into feature/sungbino_caf-calo-update…
kjplows e70f014
following Gianluca's comments part1
sungbinoh 2feb51f
following Gianluca's suggestion part 2
sungbinoh c6a3c29
ParticleIDE -> ReadoutIDE
sungbinoh 035418f
minor bug fixes
sungbinoh a6b090a
moving ReadoutIDE to TrackCaloSkimmer.h and in sbn namespace. refer t…
sungbinoh 1e0a36f
updating phi to rad from degree, and modifying some lines in CMakeLis…
sungbinoh 46e144f
Refactor CAF helper functions utilized in CaloSkimmer into RecoUtils.
gputnam 6df0c30
refer to *sce in CAFMaker_module.cc from FillReco, indentation fixes
sungbinoh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to make double sure: does the offset as returned by
scealways assume the nominal electric field to have positive x direction?That assumption is an essential ingredient.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It depends on how the SCE map is saved. For SBN SCE studies, it is assumed the nominal electric field has positive x direction.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it depends on that... unfortunately I don't see that assumption documented.
However, I see many places where that assumption is made, and if you haven't noticed anything strange in testing, that will have to do.