Rename View Configuration dock to better reflect its function

[matterhorn103]

The name of the View Configuration dock implies that its purpose is to customize the general properties of the view. Perhaps this is once what it did.

However, these days it functions as the place to display extra configuration settings for the display types listed, toggled, and chosen in the Display Types dock.

I believe renaming it to the Display Type Configuration dock better communicates to the user what it does.

Developer Certificate of Origin
Version 1.1

Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
1 Letterman Drive
Suite D4700
San Francisco, CA, 94129

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.

Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.

[ghutchis]

Somehow I didn't see this buried down here. I'm fine with changing the wording, but let's go with "Settings" to keep it a bit shorter and consistent.

[ghutchis]

@matterhorn103 - do you want me to close this and submit a new pull request or do you want to fix this one?

[matterhorn103]

I've rebased and made the suggested change :)