Skip to content

Conversation

@MasonProtter
Copy link
Collaborator

@MasonProtter MasonProtter commented Jun 18, 2025

The PR #32 somehow broke a couple things in the Neuroblox.jl docs building pipeline due to how it interacted with the GraphDynamics tutorial. This change (which is good to do anyways) should fix that breakage. It basically just helps the differential equation solvers tell if anything in the problem is a dual number.

I also did a little cleanup of unwanted clutter, and implemented a couple SymbolicIndexingInterface methods for Nums with observed variables.

The PR #32 somehow broke a
couple things in the Neuroblox.jl docs building pipeline due to how it
interacted with the GraphDynamics tutorial. This change (which is good
to do anyways) should fix that breakage. It basically just helps the
differential equation solvers tell if anything in the problem is a
dual number.

I also did a little cleanup of unwanted stuff, and implemented a
couple SymbolicIndexingInterface methods for `Num`s with observed variables.
@MasonProtter MasonProtter merged commit ffc0bc2 into master Jun 18, 2025
7 checks passed
@MasonProtter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sidenote, it turns out that the breakage wasn't from #32, that actually broke earlier as can be seen in the CI logs for https://github.com/Neuroblox/Neuroblox.jl/pull/599. I'm guessing there was some upstream change in how anyeltypedual works, and it happened to be around the same time as #32.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants