Maintenance: MotionWordEndAction - Fix typo in comment

[claude]

Summary

During routine codebase maintenance, I inspected the motion text actions and found a typo in a comment.

Area Inspected

• File: vim-engine/src/main/kotlin/com/maddyhome/idea/vim/action/motion/text/MotionWordEndAction.kt
• Related test: src/test/java/org/jetbrains/plugins/ideavim/action/motion/text/MotionBigWordEndRightActionTest.kt

Issue Found

The comment on line 68 contained "e.q." which should be "e.g." (the abbreviation for "exempli gratia", meaning "for example").

Changes Made

• Fixed typo: changed "e.q." to "e.g." in the comment explaining change command behavior

Why This Improves the Code

• Correctness: Uses the proper Latin abbreviation
• Readability: Makes the comment easier to understand for readers familiar with standard abbreviations
• Professionalism: Maintains consistent use of proper abbreviations throughout the codebase

Additional Observations

During my inspection, I also reviewed:

• Test coverage: Comprehensive tests exist with good edge case coverage
• Code quality: The implementation is well-structured and follows Kotlin conventions
• No other issues found in this area

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[claude]

Pull Request Review

Summary

This PR fixes a simple typo in a comment, changing "e.q." to "e.g." in the MotionWordEndAction.kt file.

✅ Code Quality Assessment

Positive Aspects:

• Correctness: The fix is accurate - "e.g." (exempli gratia) is the proper Latin abbreviation for "for example", while "e.q." is not a standard abbreviation
• Scope: Appropriately minimal change affecting only documentation, no functional code changes
• Zero Risk: Comment-only changes carry no runtime risk or potential for introducing bugs
• Clear Intent: The PR description clearly explains what was found and why it was fixed

📋 Review Details

File Changed: vim-engine/src/main/kotlin/com/maddyhome/idea/vim/action/motion/text/MotionWordEndAction.kt:68

Change:

- // If we are doing this move as part of a change command (e.q. cw), we need to count the current end of
+ // If we are doing this move as part of a change command (e.g. cw), we need to count the current end of

Analysis:

• The comment explains important behavior for the cw (change word) command
• The fix improves readability and professionalism
• No impact on functionality, test coverage, or performance

🔍 Additional Checks

✅ Security: N/A - comment-only change
✅ Performance: N/A - comment-only change
✅ Test Coverage: N/A - no functional changes requiring tests
✅ Breaking Changes: None
✅ Documentation: This change improves inline documentation

📝 Recommendations

This PR is ready to merge ✓

This is a straightforward documentation fix with no concerns. The change:

• Improves code clarity
• Follows best practices for technical writing
• Requires no additional testing or validation
• Has no downstream impact

Minor Observations

While reviewing the surrounding code, I noticed the implementation is well-structured with:

• Good separation of concerns (sealed class with direction-specific implementations)
• Clear, descriptive variable names
• Helpful comments explaining Vim compatibility nuances

No action needed, but the codebase quality in this area is commendable.

---

Verdict: ✅ APPROVE - Ready to merge