-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 469
chore: fix docs builds [backport 4.0] #15539
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 4.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit fdd8fed)
|
|
Bootstrap import analysisComparison of import times between this PR and base. SummaryThe average import time from this PR is: 210 ± 3 ms. The average import time from base is: 208 ± 3 ms. The import time difference between this PR and base is: 1.4 ± 0.1 ms. Import time breakdownThe following import paths have grown:
|
Performance SLOsComparing candidate backport-15533-to-4.0 (001cb16) with baseline 4.0 (e87d26f) 📈 Performance Regressions (1 suite)📈 iastaspectsospath - 24/24✅ ospathbasename_aspectTime: ✅ 4.932µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -50.7%) vs baseline: 📈 +15.4% Memory: ✅ 39.793MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ ospathbasename_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.084µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -89.2%) vs baseline: +0.2% Memory: ✅ 39.833MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.8%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ ospathjoin_aspectTime: ✅ 6.858µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -31.4%) vs baseline: 📈 +10.7% Memory: ✅ 39.754MB (SLO: <41.000MB -3.0%) vs baseline: +4.5% ✅ ospathjoin_noaspectTime: ✅ 2.295µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -77.1%) vs baseline: +0.1% Memory: ✅ 39.872MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.8%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ ospathnormcase_aspectTime: ✅ 3.551µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -64.5%) vs baseline: -0.1% Memory: ✅ 39.754MB (SLO: <41.000MB -3.0%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ ospathnormcase_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.573µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -94.3%) vs baseline: +1.9% Memory: ✅ 39.774MB (SLO: <41.000MB -3.0%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ ospathsplit_aspectTime: ✅ 4.934µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -50.7%) vs baseline: +2.1% Memory: ✅ 39.774MB (SLO: <41.000MB -3.0%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ ospathsplit_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.590µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -84.1%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 39.813MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ ospathsplitdrive_aspectTime: ✅ 3.682µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -63.2%) vs baseline: -0.9% Memory: ✅ 39.813MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ ospathsplitdrive_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.697µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -93.0%) vs baseline: +0.9% Memory: ✅ 39.813MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ ospathsplitext_aspectTime: ✅ 4.618µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -53.8%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 39.793MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ ospathsplitext_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.377µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -86.2%) vs baseline: -0.1% Memory: ✅ 39.715MB (SLO: <41.000MB -3.1%) vs baseline: +4.6% 🟡 Near SLO Breach (2 suites)🟡 otelspan - 22/22✅ add-eventTime: ✅ 38.628ms (SLO: <47.150ms 📉 -18.1%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 39.000MB (SLO: <47.000MB 📉 -17.0%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ add-metricsTime: ✅ 259.460ms (SLO: <344.800ms 📉 -24.8%) vs baseline: +0.5% Memory: ✅ 43.352MB (SLO: <47.500MB -8.7%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ add-tagsTime: ✅ 314.870ms (SLO: <321.000ms 🟡 -1.9%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 43.274MB (SLO: <47.500MB -8.9%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ get-contextTime: ✅ 78.729ms (SLO: <92.350ms 📉 -14.7%) vs baseline: -0.5% Memory: ✅ 39.276MB (SLO: <46.500MB 📉 -15.5%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ is-recordingTime: ✅ 35.933ms (SLO: <44.500ms 📉 -19.3%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 38.867MB (SLO: <47.500MB 📉 -18.2%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ record-exceptionTime: ✅ 56.780ms (SLO: <67.650ms 📉 -16.1%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 39.331MB (SLO: <47.000MB 📉 -16.3%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ set-statusTime: ✅ 42.436ms (SLO: <50.400ms 📉 -15.8%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 38.733MB (SLO: <47.000MB 📉 -17.6%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ startTime: ✅ 36.288ms (SLO: <43.450ms 📉 -16.5%) vs baseline: +2.7% Memory: ✅ 38.825MB (SLO: <47.000MB 📉 -17.4%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ start-finishTime: ✅ 82.345ms (SLO: <88.000ms -6.4%) vs baseline: +0.8% Memory: ✅ 36.608MB (SLO: <46.500MB 📉 -21.3%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ start-finish-telemetryTime: ✅ 83.418ms (SLO: <89.000ms -6.3%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 36.707MB (SLO: <46.500MB 📉 -21.1%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ update-nameTime: ✅ 36.838ms (SLO: <45.150ms 📉 -18.4%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 38.884MB (SLO: <47.000MB 📉 -17.3%) vs baseline: +4.8% 🟡 telemetryaddmetric - 30/30✅ 1-count-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 2.898µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -85.5%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 34.603MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.5%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ 1-count-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 201.171µs (SLO: <220.000µs -8.6%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 34.623MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.5%) vs baseline: +5.2% ✅ 1-distribution-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 3.305µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -83.5%) vs baseline: +1.6% Memory: ✅ 34.544MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ 1-distribution-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 214.108µs (SLO: <230.000µs -6.9%) vs baseline: -0.1% Memory: ✅ 34.544MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ 1-gauge-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 2.177µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -89.1%) vs baseline: +0.5% Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 1-gauge-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 137.491µs (SLO: <150.000µs -8.3%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 1-rate-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 3.042µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -84.8%) vs baseline: -0.4% Memory: ✅ 34.446MB (SLO: <35.500MB -3.0%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 1-rate-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 215.254µs (SLO: <250.000µs 📉 -13.9%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 34.505MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.8%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 100-count-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 20.528ms (SLO: <22.000ms -6.7%) vs baseline: +1.7% Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ 100-distribution-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 2.258ms (SLO: <2.300ms 🟡 -1.8%) vs baseline: +0.7% Memory: ✅ 34.485MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ 100-gauge-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 1.407ms (SLO: <1.550ms -9.2%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 34.465MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.5% ✅ 100-rate-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 2.212ms (SLO: <2.550ms 📉 -13.2%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 34.426MB (SLO: <35.500MB -3.0%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ flush-1-metricTime: ✅ 4.514µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -77.4%) vs baseline: +0.7% Memory: ✅ 34.623MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.5%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ flush-100-metricsTime: ✅ 175.292µs (SLO: <250.000µs 📉 -29.9%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 34.544MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ flush-1000-metricsTime: ✅ 2.121ms (SLO: <2.500ms 📉 -15.2%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 35.271MB (SLO: <36.500MB -3.4%) vs baseline: +4.9%
|
Backport fdd8fed from #15533 to 4.0.
Description
Our docs are failing to build in readthedocs but the build_docs job is passing in gitlab (passing, failing).
Fixed ReadTheDocs build failures by skipping spelling checks in ReadTheDocs. Different spelling backends between GitLab CI and ReadTheDocs cause inconsistent results (e.g., "jitter", "durations" pass in CI but fail in RTD).
Changes:
Testing
Risks
None