[zookeeper] Update zookeeper statefulset to use existing peristent volume claim if set #698
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…sistent volume claim if set Signed-off-by: Gianni Carafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gianni Carafa <[email protected]>
zOnlyKroks
deleted the
669-existingclaim-is-not-implemented-for-zookeeper
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the change
Fixes existingClaim values behaviour.
Benefits
Possible drawbacks
None.
Applicable issues
Additional information
None
Checklist
Chart.yamlaccording to semver. This is not necessary when the changes only affect README.md files.README.md