docs/question: differences & pros & cons as compared to wtransport?

[jessekrubin]

Hi!

I am adding web-transport to a server I am working on and am curious what the differences between this repo/set-of-crates and the wtransport crates (https://github.com/BiagioFesta/wtransport)

I think some sort of comparison would be good; I think it maybe makes more sense for some sort of comparison to live in this repo as it is (AFAICT) the newer set of crates?

Thanks so much! Works great!

[coderabbitai]

A summary of the changes CodeRabbit can apply:

• Add COMPARISON.md (275-line detailed side-by-side comparison of web-transport vs wtransport: quick summary table, architecture, API examples, cross-platform support, protocol details, performance, maturity, and recommendation favoring web-transport for browser use) and update README.md to include a reference link to the new comparison.

• Add a new COMPARISON.md with a comprehensive side-by-side comparison of web-transport vs wtransport (architecture, API, platform support, protocol/implementation depth, use cases, migration, performance, examples, references, and contributing) and update README.md to add a "Comparison with wtransport" section linking to COMPARISON.md.

• ✅ Create PR with these edits
• 📋 Get copyable edits

[kixelated]

Hey @jessekrubin , both crates were made independently around the same time. I renamed from webtransport-quinn to web-transport-quinn because webtransport wasn't available but web-transport was

TBH I don't know the differences, except that I copied the Quinn API verbatim on purpose.

[jessekrubin]

Howdy @kixelated!

Thanks so much for the honest response! AFAICT the deps for thing I am working on now align more with your libraries so I am going to give it a go. Can keep you posted if you like.

Different question: Do you have any recs w/ respect to integrating w/ an axum server? I figure worst case scenario I can just have 2 server tasks.

[kixelated]

Howdy @kixelated!

Thanks so much for the honest response! AFAICT the deps for thing I am working on now align more with your libraries so I am going to give it a go. Can keep you posted if you like.

Different question: Do you have any recs w/ respect to integrating w/ an axum server? I figure worst case scenario I can just have 2 server tasks.

I don't know the state of HTTP/3 servers. The problem is that they would need to support WebTransport natively because it happens via a HTTP/3 handshake.

But you can always host Axum via TCP and WebTransport via UDP on the same port. That's what I'm doing for moq-relay. Also here's how I'm supporting the web-transport-ws fallback via Axum.

[jessekrubin]

@kixelated thanks so much that is super super helpful!