-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
[AGTMETRICS-393] Prevent DSD server from starting when data plane is enabled and handling DSD. #43876
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Go Package Import DifferencesBaseline: 12bfa8a
|
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 12bfa8a Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +1.49 | [-1.49, +4.48] | 1 | Logs |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +1.49 | [-1.49, +4.48] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | +0.58 | [+0.49, +0.68] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_delta | memory utilization | +0.41 | [+0.21, +0.61] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory utilization | +0.32 | [+0.12, +0.53] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | +0.30 | [+0.07, +0.54] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | +0.13 | [+0.04, +0.21] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.11 | [+0.06, +0.16] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.36, +0.39] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.13, +0.16] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.08, +0.09] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.12, +0.13] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.43, +0.41] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.42, +0.35] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.09, +0.02] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | -0.08 | [-0.23, +0.07] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.11 | [-0.16, -0.06] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | -0.12 | [-0.17, -0.07] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter | memory utilization | -0.13 | [-0.37, +0.10] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative | memory utilization | -0.25 | [-0.40, -0.09] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.27 | [-0.32, -0.22] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | -0.44 | [-0.50, -0.38] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.52 | [-0.60, -0.44] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -2.31 | [-3.73, -0.88] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | cpu_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
What does this PR do?
Ensures that the DogStatsD server in the Core Agent does not run when Agent Data Plane is enabled and serving DSD traffic.
Motivation
Only one process can be handling DSD at a time, so this code is a strengthening of that invariant which we have been achieving, to date, by setting the appropriate environment variables for the respective processes. Doing so technically works, but is fragile and better handled directly in the Core Agent.
As part of doing this, we've introduced a new wrapper type for basic DSD configuration which currently only contains the logic around if DSD is enabled at all, and where it's enabled. This lets us centralize the logic as we depend on it in a few different places throughout the codebase. Our logic now considers the notion of DogStatsD being enabled at all -- like, does the customer want DSD to be running, regardless of how we actually make that happen? -- and then separately can figure out where it's enabled.
Additionally, we now skip displaying the
DogStatsDsection in theagent statusoutput when DSD is disabled internally, as the metrics will always be zero and ADP will be pushing its status data to RAR and will effectively take over in terms of providing DSD status.Describe how you validated your changes
Built and ran the Agent locally, with a few different variations of config settings:
use_dogstatsd->false: DSD does not run in Core Agent, Core Agent-specific DSD section not present in status outputdata_plane.enabled/data_plane.dogstatsd.enabled->true: DSD does not run in Core Agent, Core Agent-specific DSD section not present in status outputuse_dogstatsd->false,data_plane.enabled/data_plane.dogstatsd.enabled->true: DSD does not run in Core Agent, Core Agent-specific DSD section not present in status outputAdditionally, we've added new unit tests (and updated some existing ones) to ensure the logic is obeyed in terms of when DSD should and should not be running in the Core Agent.
Additional Notes