BUG in 1.13.15 -> BR-CO-27 wrong codes used (CII) and still wrong naming

[AndreasPvd]

1. BR-CO-27 should check if in a CREDIT TRANSFER (BG-17) only one of the two possible options are used for BT-84

The codes for CREDIT transfer are 30 and 58

With the updated version a new context was created:

<rule context="$Credit_Payment_instructions ">
    <assert test="$BR-CO-27" flag="fatal" id="BR-CO-27">[BR-CO-27]- Either the IBAN or a Proprietary ID (BT-84) shall be used.</assert>
  </rule>

here is the context

<param name="Credit_Payment_instructions " value="//ram:SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans[some $code in tokenize('49 59', '\s')  satisfies normalize-space(ram:TypeCode) = $code]"/>

As you can see 49 / 59 are used. This is wrong. 30 / 58 must be used.

2. BR-CO-27 is not an offical EN-Rule and the same challenges as with The IDs of some of the new Business Rules of the upcoming EU EN 16931 are already taken by Validator Rules #445 may apply. Please rename from BR-CO-27 to CII-SR-467

[oriol]

We will remove this rule for this release and consider it for the next release